The Regulation of Misconduct in Adjudication and Arbitration

Accessing papers

If you are logged in as a member or a registered academic, you will see a link to download the paper for FREE. The link is just above the Add to Cart button.

If you wish to purchase the paper, you must be logged in first (click here to log in, or click here to register). You will then see the Add to Cart button. You may also have a choice of preferred format if both are available - PDF download costs £3 inc VAT, printed version costs £7.50 inc postage (no VAT). Choosing one or the other changes the price displayed.

When you are ready to check out, use the 'View basket' link in the top left of the website.

James Pickavance

April 2016

A paper presented to the Society of Construction Law at a meeting in Cardiff on 25th November 2015

This paper focuses on two aspects of misconduct on the part of lawyers and experts in adjudication and arbitration.  In particular: first, intimidation by lawyers of arbiters (adjudicators or arbitrators); and second, an improper approach to evidence by an expert, either self-directed or influenced by the instructing lawyer.  The first part of the paper explores the rules in place to control the conduct of lawyers admitted in England & Wales in domestic and international arbitration and statutory adjudication.  It outlines some of the tactics commonly used to intimidate arbiters, considers what sanctions or measures are available to an arbiter, and lastly highlights some case law on point.  The second part follows the same structure, as applied to experts.  The final part of the paper offers some suggestions for the ways in which the shortcomings of the existing rules might be addressed. 

A.  Introduction – B.  The opportunity for misconduct – Private proceedings – Relatively unregulated procedure – Greater risk of improper influence – C.  Lawyers – National Standards – Transnational standards – D.  Intimidation – E.  Sanction for misconduct: adjudication – F.  Sanctions for misconduct: arbitration – Case law – G.  Experts – Standards – Codes of practice for experts – Institutional rules – H.  Misconduct by experts – Sanctions against experts – I.  Conclusions and possible ways forward.

The author: James Pickavance is a partner in the litigation division at Eversheds LLP, solicitors, in London; he is also author of A Practical Guide to Construction Adjudication.

Text: 31 pages

Paper number: 
D188
April 2016, online, 760k
£3.00

Our papers

The Society has published nearly 400 papers since 1984. Some are published both in hard copy and electronically (numbered), others in electronic format only (number prefixed 'D'). The hard copy papers can be purchased (except those marked with an asterisk which are no longer available). They are all also available as PDF files to download.

Those available as downloads can be accessed free by members and registered academics (students and staff) - if logged in, they will see a link to the file just above the Add to Cart button on each paper's page. Others can purchase the PDF file for a cost of £3.00. Note that this sum includes VAT, since VAT is chargeable on digital files.

For further instructions on downloading, click here. The PDF file will only open on your computer if you have Adobe Acrobat installed (to obtain a free copy, click here). To save the paper to your computer, choose the 'save' icon on the Acrobat toolbar before opening the paper.

For personal use only

The papers on this website are for use by SCL members (and those who pay for them) only, and papers may be downloaded, printed and/or otherwise retained for that purpose only by members of the SCL (and those who purchase them).  The availability of all papers past and present represents a significant benefit to members of SCL and wider dissemination of SCL papers dilutes that to the detriment of the membership.  Further and more importantly, copyright in the papers belongs jointly to the writers of the paper and to the SCL, and the SCL is not therefore in a position to provide any wider licence.  Accordingly the SCL asks members and those who purchase papers not to disseminate papers more widely than their licence allows (e.g. by posting them on internal legal resource intranet databases and the like). 

Feedback