Proven by Computer? System Dynamics and Disruption Claims

Accessing papers

If you are logged in as a member or a registered academic, you will see a link to download the paper for FREE. The link is just above the Add to Cart button.

If you wish to purchase the paper, you must be logged in first (click here to log in, or click here to register). You will then see the Add to Cart button. You may also have a choice of preferred format if both are available - PDF download costs £3 inc VAT, printed version costs £7.50 inc postage (no VAT). Choosing one or the other changes the price displayed.

When you are ready to check out, use the 'View basket' link in the top left of the website.

Ralph Goodchild

September 2018

A paper based on the joint second prize winning entry in the Hudson essay competition 2017 and presented to the Society of Construction Law at a meeting in London on 8th May 2018

The paper evaluates the potential for system dynamics (SD) modelling to be used as a form of delay and disruption analysis. Ralph Goodchild explains how SD modelling seeks to provide a computer simulation of a construction project to analyse the impact of disruption as an alternative to the analysis of ‘real’ project records. He goes on to discuss the challenges of bringing a disruption claim based on an SD model, such as admissibility, the tension with witnesses of fact and the relationships between SD model evidence and traditional delay analysis.

I. SD modelling and the SD ‘world view’ – How an SD model is built – Presentation of SD modelling results – Validating an SD model – II. Challenges in using SD modelling in disruption claims – Admissibility as evidence – Reliance on fact witness evidence – SD models and alternative hypotheticals – Relationship to traditional delay analysis – SD models and correlation with project data – SD models and quantum experts – SD models and legal basis for recovery of loss – The importance of accurate model structure – SD models and assumptions about re-work – The use of model-derived parameter values – III. Conclusion

The author: Ralph Goodchild is an associate solicitor at White & Case LLP, London.

Text: 16 pages

Paper number: 
212
September 2018, printed and online, 970k
£3.00

Our papers

The Society has published nearly 400 papers since 1984. Some are published both in hard copy and electronically (numbered), others in electronic format only (number prefixed 'D'). The hard copy papers can be purchased (except those marked with an asterisk which are no longer available). They are all also available as PDF files to download.

Those available as downloads can be accessed free by members and registered academics (students and staff) - if logged in, they will see a link to the file just above the Add to Cart button on each paper's page. Others can purchase the PDF file for a cost of £3.00. Note that this sum includes VAT, since VAT is chargeable on digital files.

For further instructions on downloading, click here. The PDF file will only open on your computer if you have Adobe Acrobat installed (to obtain a free copy, click here). To save the paper to your computer, choose the 'save' icon on the Acrobat toolbar before opening the paper.

For personal use only

The papers on this website are for use by SCL members (and those who pay for them) only, and papers may be downloaded, printed and/or otherwise retained for that purpose only by members of the SCL (and those who purchase them).  The availability of all papers past and present represents a significant benefit to members of SCL and wider dissemination of SCL papers dilutes that to the detriment of the membership.  Further and more importantly, copyright in the papers belongs jointly to the writers of the paper and to the SCL, and the SCL is not therefore in a position to provide any wider licence.  Accordingly the SCL asks members and those who purchase papers not to disseminate papers more widely than their licence allows (e.g. by posting them on internal legal resource intranet databases and the like). 

Feedback