Payment in the Construction Industry – where are we now?

Accessing papers

If you are logged in as a member or a registered academic, you will see a link to download the paper for FREE. The link is just above the Add to Cart button.

If you wish to purchase the paper, you must be logged in first (click here to log in, or click here to register). You will then see the Add to Cart button. You may also have a choice of preferred format if both are available - PDF download costs £3 inc VAT, printed version costs £7.50 inc postage (no VAT). Choosing one or the other changes the price displayed.

When you are ready to check out, use the 'View basket' link in the top left of the website.

Rudi Klein

June 2019

A paper presented to the Society of Construction Law at meetings in Cambridge on 15th October 2018 and Edinburgh on 29th November 2018

This paper examines payment practices in the UK construction industry, following the collapse of Carillion in 2018, and the various initiatives that have attempted to resolve the issues over the years. It looks at how an effective framework for payment security should be established with certainties of timing, amount, enforcement and recovery and goes on to consider how continuing payment problems in the industry could be addressed. The author offers suggestions including: reform of the adjudication provisions; changes to the payment notices regime, the public contracts regulations and reporting requirements; the mandating of project bank accounts; and the protection of retentions.

Impact of poor payment practices– Establishing an effective framework for payment security in construction – Certainty of timing – Certainty of amount– Certainty of enforcement– Certainty of recovery– The Construction Act –What are the continuing payment problems and how should they be addressed?– The adjudication provisions – Payment notices– Project bank accounts (PBAs)– Public Contracts Regulations 2015 – Requirement to report on payment performance – Retentions – The way forward – Annex A (Draft Public Sector Supply Chains (Project Bank Accounts) Bill) – Annex B (Construction (Retentions Deposit Schemes) Bill) – Annex C (A statutory retention deposit scheme: how it could work)

The author: Rudi KleinLLB FCIOB FRSA is a barrister, CEO of the Specialist Engineering Contractors’ (SEC) Group and President of the NEC Users’ Group. He is an Honorary Member of the Society of Construction Law.

Text: 24 pages and 3 annexes

Paper number: 
D220
June 2019, online, 5MB
£3.00

Our papers

The Society has published nearly 400 papers since 1984. Some are published both in hard copy and electronically (numbered), others in electronic format only (number prefixed 'D'). The hard copy papers can be purchased (except those marked with an asterisk which are no longer available). They are all also available as PDF files to download.

Those available as downloads can be accessed free by members and registered academics (students and staff) - if logged in, they will see a link to the file just above the Add to Cart button on each paper's page. Others can purchase the PDF file for a cost of £3.00. Note that this sum includes VAT, since VAT is chargeable on digital files.

For further instructions on downloading, click here. The PDF file will only open on your computer if you have Adobe Acrobat installed (to obtain a free copy, click here). To save the paper to your computer, choose the 'save' icon on the Acrobat toolbar before opening the paper.

For personal use only

The papers on this website are for use by SCL members (and those who pay for them) only, and papers may be downloaded, printed and/or otherwise retained for that purpose only by members of the SCL (and those who purchase them).  The availability of all papers past and present represents a significant benefit to members of SCL and wider dissemination of SCL papers dilutes that to the detriment of the membership.  Further and more importantly, copyright in the papers belongs jointly to the writers of the paper and to the SCL, and the SCL is not therefore in a position to provide any wider licence.  Accordingly the SCL asks members and those who purchase papers not to disseminate papers more widely than their licence allows (e.g. by posting them on internal legal resource intranet databases and the like). 

Feedback