Improving Value Through the FAC-1 Framework Alliance Contract

Accessing papers

If you are logged in as a member or a registered academic, you will see a link to download the paper for FREE. The link is just above the Add to Cart button.

If you wish to purchase the paper, you must be logged in first (click here to log in, or click here to register). You will then see the Add to Cart button. You may also have a choice of preferred format if both are available - PDF download costs £3 inc VAT, printed version costs £7.50 inc postage (no VAT). Choosing one or the other changes the price displayed.

When you are ready to check out, use the 'View basket' link in the top left of the website.

David Mosey

November 2017

A paper based on a talk given at the King’s College London Centre of Construction Law Open Forum on 30th March 2017

David Mosey’s paper introduces the FAC-1 Framework Alliance Contract, a new type of standard form contract.  He explains how the document combines the features of a framework contract and an alliance contract to achieve a strategic and collaborative approach to procurement, connecting multiple projects, integrating team members and setting out new processes for improving value.  He examines the concept of a multi-party framework alliance, highlighting recent examples of UK Government trial projects.  He then focuses on the provisions of the FAC-1 Framework Alliance Contract, analysing how it manages the award of work, how it uses shared objectives, success measures and incentives and how it supports alliance activities and interactions.  He goes on to detail how FAC-1 enables improved value through BIM and supports collaborative working and joint risk management.  Finally he documents the experiences of some new users of the contract and how FAC-1 has attracted interest for use in other jurisdictions.

Introduction – What is a framework alliance? – What is the FAC-1 Framework Alliance Contract? – How does FAC-1 manage the award of work? – How does FAC-1 manage shared objectives, success measures and incentives? – How does FAC-1 support alliance activities and interactions? – How does FAC-1 fit with BIM? – How does FAC-1 support collaborative working and joint risk management? – Who is using FAC-1?

The author: Professor David Mosey PhD is Director of the Centre of Construction Law and Dispute Resolution at King’s College London and for 20 years was Head of Projects and Construction at London law firm Trowers & Hamlins.

Text: 15 pages

Paper number: 
D209
November 2017, online, 500k
£3.00

Our papers

The Society has published nearly 400 papers since 1984. Some are published both in hard copy and electronically (numbered), others in electronic format only (number prefixed 'D'). The hard copy papers can be purchased (except those marked with an asterisk which are no longer available). They are all also available as PDF files to download.

Those available as downloads can be accessed free by members and registered academics (students and staff) - if logged in, they will see a link to the file just above the Add to Cart button on each paper's page. Others can purchase the PDF file for a cost of £3.00. Note that this sum includes VAT, since VAT is chargeable on digital files.

For further instructions on downloading, click here. The PDF file will only open on your computer if you have Adobe Acrobat installed (to obtain a free copy, click here). To save the paper to your computer, choose the 'save' icon on the Acrobat toolbar before opening the paper.

For personal use only

The papers on this website are for use by SCL members (and those who pay for them) only, and papers may be downloaded, printed and/or otherwise retained for that purpose only by members of the SCL (and those who purchase them).  The availability of all papers past and present represents a significant benefit to members of SCL and wider dissemination of SCL papers dilutes that to the detriment of the membership.  Further and more importantly, copyright in the papers belongs jointly to the writers of the paper and to the SCL, and the SCL is not therefore in a position to provide any wider licence.  Accordingly the SCL asks members and those who purchase papers not to disseminate papers more widely than their licence allows (e.g. by posting them on internal legal resource intranet databases and the like). 

Feedback