Extensions of Time: the Conflict Between the 'Prevention Principal'

Accessing papers

If you are logged in as a member or a registered academic, you will see a link to download the paper for FREE. The link is just above the Add to Cart button.

If you wish to purchase the paper, you must be logged in first (click here to log in, or click here to register). You will then see the Add to Cart button. You may also have a choice of preferred format if both are available - PDF download costs £3 inc VAT, printed version costs £7.50 inc postage (no VAT). Choosing one or the other changes the price displayed.

When you are ready to check out, use the 'View basket' link in the top left of the website.

Hamish Lal

April 2002

A paper based on the second prize winning entry in the Hudson Prize
Competition 2001 presented to the Society of Construction Law in London
on 9th April 2002.

The author asks whether the employer can exercise the contractual rights
and remedies ordinarily available to him when the contractor has failed
to meet the completion date in the following situation: the employer has
caused a delay to the contractor’s progress but the contractor fails
to submit a notice or claim for the extension of time commensurate with
the notice requirements clause in the contract, where it is stated to
be a condition precedent that such notice be given. He looks at the conflict
between the strict adherence to notice requirements and the principle
that a party can not rely on its wrong (the ‘prevention principle’).

Introduction – Summary – Part A: the English law approach
– The prevention principle – Construing notice requirement
as a condition precedent – The standard forms of contract –
Part B: Australian and Scottish law – In favour of the prevention
principle: Gaymark Investments – In favour of notice requirements:
City Inn Ltd – Part C: Prevention principle or notice requirements?

The author: Dr Hamish Lal is a solicitor at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.

Text 14 pages.

PDF file size: 207k

Paper number: 
103
April 2002 printed/online, 207k
£3.00

Our papers

The Society has published nearly 400 papers since 1984. Some are published both in hard copy and electronically (numbered), others in electronic format only (number prefixed 'D'). The hard copy papers can be purchased (except those marked with an asterisk which are no longer available). They are all also available as PDF files to download.

Those available as downloads can be accessed free by members and registered academics (students and staff) - if logged in, they will see a link to the file just above the Add to Cart button on each paper's page. Others can purchase the PDF file for a cost of £3.00. Note that this sum includes VAT, since VAT is chargeable on digital files.

For further instructions on downloading, click here. The PDF file will only open on your computer if you have Adobe Acrobat installed (to obtain a free copy, click here). To save the paper to your computer, choose the 'save' icon on the Acrobat toolbar before opening the paper.

For personal use only

The papers on this website are for use by SCL members (and those who pay for them) only, and papers may be downloaded, printed and/or otherwise retained for that purpose only by members of the SCL (and those who purchase them).  The availability of all papers past and present represents a significant benefit to members of SCL and wider dissemination of SCL papers dilutes that to the detriment of the membership.  Further and more importantly, copyright in the papers belongs jointly to the writers of the paper and to the SCL, and the SCL is not therefore in a position to provide any wider licence.  Accordingly the SCL asks members and those who purchase papers not to disseminate papers more widely than their licence allows (e.g. by posting them on internal legal resource intranet databases and the like). 

Feedback