Recent Developments in Interpretation of Contracts: A Picture of Consistency and Clarity?

Accessing papers

If you are logged in as a member or a registered academic, you will see a link to download the paper for FREE. The link is just above the Add to Cart button.

If you wish to purchase the paper, you must be logged in first (click here to log in, or click here to register). You will then see the Add to Cart button. You may also have a choice of preferred format if both are available - PDF download costs £3, printed version costs £7.50 inc postage. Choosing one or the other changes the price displayed.

When you are ready to check out, use the 'View basket' link in the top left of the website.

Isabel Hitching QC

April 2020

A paper presented to the Society of Construction Law at a meeting in Birmingham on 19th June 2019 and updated to 17 April 2020

In this paper the author poses the following questions: How are the courts in this jurisdiction interpreting contracts? Is there sufficient certainty as to their approach to give confidence to either those advising on present disputes or those considering an English choice of law clause in future contracts? The paper explores the principles of interpretation and focuses on two recent cases, Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Co Ltd and Teesside Gas Transportation Ltd v Cats North Sea Ltd, to understand how the courts are approaching the exercise of interpretation in the TCC field. The author concludes that English contract law is clear and consistent.  Each case is fact specific but how those facts are to be assessed is not in doubt. Parties are safe to adopt English law clauses knowing that the court or arbitrator will be applying clear and unchanging principles in interpreting them.  

Introduction – The scope of interpretation – The principles to be applied – An exploration of the principles – Two general points – Factors (1) to (3) – Factor (4) – Factor (5) – Applying the principles – Two recent cases in the TCC field – Triple Point – Teesside – Conclusion

The author: Isabel Hitching QC is a barrister practising from Crown Office Chambers and a former lecturer at Christ Church, Oxford.

Text: 16 pages

Paper number: 
223
April 2020, printed and online, 1.1MB
£3.00

Our papers

The Society has published nearly 400 papers since 1984. Some are published both in hard copy and electronically (numbered), others in electronic format only (number prefixed 'D'). The hard copy papers can be purchased (except those marked with an asterisk which are no longer available). They are all also available as PDF files to download.

Those available as downloads can be accessed free by members and registered academics (students and staff) - if logged in, they will see a link to the file just above the Add to Cart button on each paper's page. Others can purchase the PDF file for a cost of £3.00. 

For further instructions on downloading, click here. The PDF file will only open on your computer if you have Adobe Acrobat installed (to obtain a free copy, click here). To save the paper to your computer, choose the 'save' icon on the Acrobat toolbar before opening the paper.

For personal use only

The papers on this website are for use by SCL members (and those who pay for them) only, and papers may be downloaded, printed and/or otherwise retained for that purpose only by members of the SCL (and those who purchase them).  The availability of all papers past and present represents a significant benefit to members of SCL and wider dissemination of SCL papers dilutes that to the detriment of the membership.  Further and more importantly, copyright in the papers belongs jointly to the writers of the paper and to the SCL, and the SCL is not therefore in a position to provide any wider licence.  Accordingly the SCL asks members and those who purchase papers not to disseminate papers more widely than their licence allows (e.g. by posting them on internal legal resource intranet databases and the like). 

Feedback