The battle between logical purity and commercial expedience: heralding limits to the 'twin agreement fiction'

Accessing papers

If you are logged in as a member or a registered academic, you will see a link to download the paper for FREE. The link is just above the Add to Cart button.

If you wish to purchase the paper, you must be logged in first (click here to log in, or click here to register). You will then see the Add to Cart button. You may also have a choice of preferred format if both are available - PDF download costs £3 inc VAT, printed version costs £7.50 inc postage (no VAT). Choosing one or the other changes the price displayed.

When you are ready to check out, use the 'View basket' link in the top left of the website.

Adrian Baron

November 2005

A paper based on the second prize winning entry in the Hudson Prize Competition 2004

If a contract includes arbitration provisions, does the arbitrator have power to determine issues relating to the status of that contract, either when entered into or in the light of later events? For reasons of practicality, most common law systems accept the 'twin agreement' fiction, which in some of these circumstances treats the arbitration provisions as a separate (or divisible contract), so enabling arbitration to go ahead even though the existence or survival of the main contract may be in issue.But
how widely should this fiction be applied? Adrian Baron considers the position in English, Australian and US law and argues for a return to basics.

The essence of an arbitration agreement - Extending the Heyman principle - Australian developments - The united States authorities - Conclusion.

The author:

Adrian Baron is General Counsel with John Holland Pty Ltd, constuction contractors, Australia.

Text: 18 pages

PDF file size: 92k

Paper number: 
November 2005, online only, 92k

Our papers

The Society has published nearly 400 papers since 1984. Some are published both in hard copy and electronically (numbered), others in electronic format only (number prefixed 'D'). The hard copy papers can be purchased (except those marked with an asterisk which are no longer available). They are all also available as PDF files to download.

Those available as downloads can be accessed free by members and registered academics (students and staff) - if logged in, they will see a link to the file just above the Add to Cart button on each paper's page. Others can purchase the PDF file for a cost of £3.00. Note that this sum includes VAT, since VAT is chargeable on digital files.

For further instructions on downloading, click here. The PDF file will only open on your computer if you have Adobe Acrobat installed (to obtain a free copy, click here). To save the paper to your computer, choose the 'save' icon on the Acrobat toolbar before opening the paper.

For personal use only

The papers on this website are for use by SCL members (and those who pay for them) only, and papers may be downloaded, printed and/or otherwise retained for that purpose only by members of the SCL (and those who purchase them).  The availability of all papers past and present represents a significant benefit to members of SCL and wider dissemination of SCL papers dilutes that to the detriment of the membership.  Further and more importantly, copyright in the papers belongs jointly to the writers of the paper and to the SCL, and the SCL is not therefore in a position to provide any wider licence.  Accordingly the SCL asks members and those who purchase papers not to disseminate papers more widely than their licence allows (e.g. by posting them on internal legal resource intranet databases and the like).